Administrative sanctions under the Labour Code

Administrative penalties under the Labour Code are considered to be violations of discipline in an enterprise: the absence of a citizen without a valid reason in the workplace or in the workplace as a whole; the refusal, without a valid reason, to conclude a contract of liability, if service with values is the primary duty of a person and has been agreed upon at the time of admission to the enterprise; and, in accordance with the provisions of the law, the said contract may be concluded with a citizen; the types of punishment of employees: disciplinary and material methods of punishment; attention shall be paid if such facts are established by the Federal Labour Inspectorate, the organization may be held administratively liable for the penalties listed in article 1. Therefore, taking into account the gravity of the offence committed, its consequences, the personality of the offender, etc.

Contents:

• Disciplinary liability (disciplinary punishment)
• Administrative sanctions under the Labour Code
• Administrative penalties are imposed.
• Article 193 of the Criminal Code: Procedure for the application of disciplinary sanctions

Disciplinary liability (disciplinary punishment)

Disciplinary misconduct and forms of punishment Disciplinary misconduct is the failure or improper performance by an employee of his or her labour duties.

Other types of disciplinary sanctions may also be imposed on certain categories of workers: severe reprimands, for example, against civil servants and members of the internal affairs agencies. Note that fines are not a lawful measure, since the Labour Code does not allow for disciplinary sanctions not provided for in federal laws, statutes and regulations on discipline.

The Labour Code also does not allow for a breach of the disciplinary procedure; such acts are punishable by a warning or an administrative fine. On the other hand, a disciplinary worker may reasonably be deprived of a bonus or other incentive payment, or their amount may be reduced if this is provided for by the employers' local regulations, the appeal decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan, however, the penalty must be commensurate with the gravity of the offence, its consequences and the circumstances in which it was committed.

In practice, the comment is a more common measure of liability than a reprimand; dismissal in the event of a single gross violation of the duty to work is the most severe form; the Labour Code contains a list of the grounds for its application, e.g. para.

Dismissal on the grounds of repeated non-performance of employment is possible provided that disciplinary action has been taken against the employee during the past year and that it has not been withdrawn or discharged at the time of re-performance without good reason; however, no matter what the first penalty was, a remark or a reprimand; this ground for dismissal does not require the employee to engage in the same misconduct, such as only late work or poor work with clients.

Any failure to comply with the obligations under the contract of employment gives the employer the right to dismiss the employee if the prior disciplinary action was carried out in accordance with the law; thus, in the authors' view, the penalty for ill-treatment of the client may be a remark if the employees' actions have not had a severe effect on the company, for example, the loss of the client, the refusal of the prospective client to enter into a favourable contract with financial indicators, etc.

The internal labour regulations, local regulations, employment contracts and official instructions may regulate the workers' interaction with clients.

These instruments may prohibit the use of abnormal language in communication, the inadmissibility of insults or other forms of unethical behaviour; they may also include detailed rules in a separate document, such as a code of conduct, ethics and business communication, and include the following duties of the employee: to respect the polite tone of communication with clients and colleagues, to show respect and tolerance; to avoid uncensored, offensive and abusive words, categorical words, incorrect tone of communication; to be careful and kind; to avoid conflict situations, to avoid incitement; to resolve contentious issues in a timely manner, using a constructive method of dialogue, business correspondence; to contribute to the creation and maintenance of a favourable moral and psychological environment in the community; and to support and develop the initiative of colleagues.

The company is required, by signature, to inform the employee of its rules before signing the contract of employment.h If it adopts new local regulations or amends existing internal documents, all employees must be informed of them prior to their entry into force and, if the substantive terms of the contract of employment are changed, two months before the amendment.

Note that the rules should not aggravate the situation of workers with regard to labour legislation, a collective agreement if it exists and must take into account the opinion of a representative body of employees when it is in the organization. Otherwise, it may be declared null and void and the imposition of disciplinary sanctions for non-compliance is unlawful.

It is also the responsibility of the company to prove that an employee has committed a disciplinary offence; it must also prove the consequences of the employees' actions and the extent of the damage caused; the imposition of disciplinary sanctions and the evidence are regulated by the provisions of the Labour Code; the fact that the employee has violated the labour discipline is recorded in writing, for example, in a management report, an act, a commissions' decision on the basis of the results of the review, since in the event of a judicial proceeding the employer will have to provide evidence of the offence of the p.p.

A model of the report note should describe the reasons for the recovery, and when the employee has committed, what point the local regulation has violated, what the consequences of its actions have been, and the disciplinary action taken against the offender can be recommended.

Please note that there is no obligation to inform an employee of these documents under labour law; once a company has learned of a disciplinary offence, it should ask the employee for a written explanation of his/her actions; this request should preferably be documented, i.e., a notice of explanation should be drawn up and the employee should be given a signature indicating the date of consultation with the copies of the document and the signature of the receipt.

The employees' model of notification of explanations must provide written explanations within two working days, which are considered to be from the date following the date on which the claim is made. The deprivation of his right may constitute grounds for the determination of a disciplinary sanction to be unlawful by the Moscow Regional Court. Please note that, in calculating the time period for providing explanations, the individual schedule of the employees' work shall not be taken into account when no explanation is given after the expiry of the two working days, the company shall draw up an act of refusal.

For example, if an explanation is requested on Monday, the next two days the company waits for it, and if it fails to do so on Thursday, the relevant act will be drawn up; the absence of an explanation does not preclude the imposition of a disciplinary measure.

If the explanation provided by the employer is reasonable, disciplinary action may not be taken; it is important to comply with the time limit for the imposition of disciplinary sanctions; it is applicable within one month of the discovery of the offence from the moment the employer learned or ought to have known of the fact, except when the employee is ill, when he is on leave and when the opinion of the representative body of the employees is taken into account. It is considered that the company has learned of the commission of the disciplinary offence from the time when he or she became known to the employees' immediate head.

The Labour Code prescribes a time limit for imposing a disciplinary penalty. Thus, if the time limit for imposing a disciplinary penalty is missed due to illness, it can no longer be applied; the uniform form of the disciplinary order is not provided for by law.

The document must contain the following information: F. A model order for disciplinary action must be drawn up if the employee refuses to read the order in writing.

The State Committee of the Russian Federations' Labour Code also does not record disciplinary action, except in cases where the disciplinary sanction is dismissal. An employee is entitled to appeal against disciplinary action to the State Labour Inspectorate, the Labour Disputes Commission and the court.

If this has not occurred, the employee shall have the right to defer consideration of the application to the court. h The period of appeal to the court shall be three months from the date of the order for disciplinary action and one month if the employee has been dismissed for a disciplinary offence.

However, a case for reinstatement must be considered before the end of the month following the date on which the application was filed with the court, including the time required to prepare the case for trial.

Please note that when a worker is brought before a court for claims arising from an employment relationship, including failure to comply with the terms of an employment contract or to properly comply with the terms of an employment contract, workers are exempted from payment of duties and legal expenses. If an employee tries to appeal dismissal for repeated failure to perform his duties and the time limit for appealing previous disciplinary offences has expired, the court will not grant his request for reinstatement of work. Review of the legislation and judicial practice of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation during the second quarter of the year.

In conclusion, the Russian Federations' Presidency stated that it was important to comply with all the requirements of the legislation concerning the procedure for imposing disciplinary sanctions; otherwise, the employee would have grounds for seeking compensation for moral harm from the company. The Russian Ministry of Labour and Social Protection had indicated that if there were provisions in the internal labour regulations, local regulations or the labour contract to prohibit the use of harsh and harsh language in communicating with clients, the employer could apply disciplinary measures to an employee in violation of the provisions in question in a letter from the Ministry of Labour of the Russian Federation in judicial practice, there were examples in which the court did not consider unethical acts of the employee and the opinion expressed different from that of the management, as a violation of labour discipline the determination of the St. Petersburg City Court against the right to freedom of thought and expression was guaranteed by article 29 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

The employee is free to express his or her opinion and to criticize the actions of others if his or her actions are not offensive and are not degrading to the honour and dignity of the individual. On the other hand, for a number of professions, failure to comply with ethical and professional rules is a disciplinary offence; for example, it concerns employees of municipal services, the police, teachers and the Moscow City Courts' definition of a company, in order to avoid the situations described in the article, it is necessary to introduce a corporate culture that includes: standards of conduct in the office; calls for compliance with and adherence to established rules in any situation; obliges managers to be an example for their subordinates; promotes respect among employees; enables monitoring of feedback on team work and periodically examines client satisfaction.

Press version: Judicial and arbitral practice in cases of administrative liability for violation of labour law by an employer: Judicial and arbitral practice in cases of administrative liability for violation of labour law by an employer. Author: A. Administrative liability for disciplinary misconduct is the failure or improper performance by an employee of his or her labour duties.

On the other hand, a disciplinary worker may reasonably be deprived of bonuses and other incentive payments, or their amount may be reduced if this is provided for by local employer regulations, the appeal decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Tartarstan of the Code of Administrative Offences Chapter 1 of the General Provisions of Article 1.

The objectives of the legislation of the Turkmen SSR on administrative offences. The legislation of the Turkmen SSR on administrative offences is to protect the social order of the USSR, socialist property, socio-economic, political and personal rights and freedoms of citizens, as well as the rights and legitimate interests of enterprises, institutions and organizations, the established procedure of administration, State and public order, the strengthening of socialist legality, the prevention of offences, the education of citizens in a spirit of strict and consistent compliance with the Constitution of the USSR, the Constitution of the Turkmen SSR and the Soviet laws, respect for the rights, honour and dignity of other citizens, the rules of socialist dormitory, the fulfilment of their duties in good faith and the responsibility to society.

In order to carry out this task, the Turkmen SSR Code on Administrative Offences defines the act or omission as an administrative offence, the administrative penalty, the authority of the official and the manner in which it may be imposed on the perpetrator of the administrative offence.

Article 2: The provisions of this Code also apply to administrative offences punishable by legislation not already included in this Code; article 3: Administrative penalties imposed by the LC and a number of other acts include: 9 revocations of a licence or qualification certificate.

In addition, the Russian Federations' CT calls for another sanction: 10 for the recovery of the value of goods and means of transport, but the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation considers that the confiscation is administratively contrary to article 10. All 10 of these penalties are closely linked and form a single system.

Their main purpose is to protect the rule of law, to influence the perpetrators of administrative violations and to prevent the commission of further violations; each penalty is a penalty, a measure of liability for administrative offences; the application of any means the imposition of administrative liability has adverse legal consequences.

A criminal offence is either deprived of some subjective right to drive a vehicle, a licence, etc. Administrative punishment causes him some suffering, deprivation, but the punishment is not an end in itself; it is a necessary means of education and prevention; the TC and a number of other acts impose such a penalty: administrative penalties are imposed by the competent authorities and officials.

1. The objectives of the Code of Administrative Offences are to protect the rights and freedoms of citizens, property and the constitutional order of Ukraine, the rights and legitimate interests of enterprises, institutions and organizations established by law, the strengthening of the rule of law, the prevention of offences and the education of citizens in a spirit of strict and consistent compliance with the Constitution and laws of Ukraine, respect for the rights, honour and dignity of other citizens, the rules of hostel and the fulfilment of their duties in good faith and responsibility towards society.

The imposition of an administrative penalty is subject to the general rules for the imposition of penalties for an administrative offence. The penalty for an administrative offence is imposed within the limits established by a legal act providing for liability for the offence committed, in strict conformity with the principles of the laws of the Union of the SSR and the Federal Republics on administrative offences, this Code and other acts on administrative offences.

The penalty shall take into account the nature of the offence committed, the offenders' identity, the extent of his or her guilt, his or her property situation, circumstances mitigating and aggravating liability; article 3 of the circumstances mitigating liability for an administrative offence shall be deemed to be: 1 palpable repentance of the perpetrator; 2 prevention of the perpetrators' harmful consequences of the offence, voluntary reparation or repair of the harm caused; 3 commission of the offence under the influence of severe mental disturbance or in connection with serious personal or family circumstances; 4 commission of the offence by a minor; 5 commission of the offence by a pregnant woman or a woman with a child under one year of age.

The imposition of an administrative penalty Article The general rules on the imposition of penalties for an administrative offence The punishment of an administrative offence shall be imposed within the limits established by a normative act providing for liability for the offence committed, in strict conformity with the principles of the laws of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Union Republics on administrative offences, this Code and other acts on administrative offences.

The authority dealing with an administrative offence may consider as mitigating circumstances and circumstances not specified in the law: the circumstances aggravating the liability for an administrative offence, the aggravating circumstances for an administrative offence, shall be recognized as: 1 continuation of the unlawful conduct despite the request of the authorized persons to cease it; 2 re-offending, within a year, the commission of a homogeneous offence for which the person has already been subject to administrative punishment; the commission of an offence by a person who has previously committed an offence; 3 involvement of a minor in an offence; 4 commission of an offence by a group of persons; 5 commission of an offence in a state of natural disaster or other emergency: 6 commission of an offence in a state of intoxication.

The administrative sanctioning authority may, depending on the nature of the administrative offence, not consider the offence to be an aggravating circumstance; administrative penalties may be imposed in the case of a number of persons; and the authorities authorized to impose administrative penalties may replace them.

Chapter 4: The imposition of an administrative penalty is responsible for violations of labour protection rules, and article 37 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation establishes the right of everyone to work under conditions that meet the requirements of safety and health.

The Labour Code of the Russian Federation, in developing this constitutional provision, imposes on the employer the obligation to ensure safety and working conditions consistent with the States' regulatory requirements for labour protection. Article 22 of the Labour Code guarantees protection of workers ' right to work under conditions consistent with the requirements of labour protection.

In addition to other measures, this guarantee is guaranteed by State supervision of compliance with the requirements of labour protection and the disciplinary, material and civil law article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the administrative and criminal liability of persons responsible for violations of labour and labour protection legislation, as provided for by law.

The preface to the fifth edition Administrative liability is a special form of public liability with its attributes and qualities alone, one of which concerns the principles of codification of rules establishing administrative liability.

Administrative sanctions under the Labour Code

The following penalties exist under the Labour Code: observation, reprimand and dismissal; the procedure for the application of measures is set out in article CLC of the Russian Federation.

Article of the Labour Code: The application of disciplinary measures in the new version of Art. If after two working days this explanation has not been provided by the employee, the relevant act shall be drawn up; failure to provide an explanation by the employee does not constitute an obstacle to the application of a disciplinary sanction.

Administrative penalties are imposed.

Article CK of the Russian Federation: The types of liability for violations of labour legislation and other acts containing labour law norms, the new version of article 6 of the Code, in accordance with the provisions of article 14 of the Code, may be imposed on the employer for refusal to employ persons with disabilities within the limits of the established quotas, and the State labour inspectors may be held responsible for any possible violation of labour law by an uncontroversial leader. The article of the Code stipulates that the payment of wages in organizations of all forms of property shall be made at least every half month of the day established by the internal labour regulations and the labour contract; however, the salary shall be delayed everywhere; the most common reason for such delays is the fault of the employer or of an official authorized by him; for this violation of labour law, the article in question provides for disciplinary, material, administrative and criminal liability.

Article 193 of the Criminal Code: Procedure for the application of disciplinary sanctions

The aim is to protect law and order, to educate those who have committed administrative offences to prevent the commission of new offences by the offenders themselves and others, and for administrative offences the following types of administrative penalties may be applied: Prevention as a measure of administrative punishment, expressed in the official condemnation of a natural or legal person, is applied for minor administrative offences and is imposed in writing; Administrative fine - recovery of property of a monetary nature may be repeated: Dear readers! Our articles describe the model ways in which legal matters are dealt with, but each case is unique.

Disciplinary misconduct and penalties for Disciplinary misconduct are the failure or improper performance of an employees' labour duties. Other forms of disciplinary punishment may also be imposed on certain categories of workers: severe reprimands, for example, against civil servants and members of the internal affairs agencies. Note that fines are not a lawful measure of influence, since the Labour Code does not allow for disciplinary sanctions not provided for in federal laws, statutes or disciplinary provisions. Also, the Labour Code does not allow for a breach of the disciplinary procedure.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.